Home > Cannot Move > Cannot Move Location Counter Backwards

Cannot Move Location Counter Backwards

Comment 4 Marcin Juszkiewicz 2010-09-29 11:46:03 UTC Created attachment 5021 [details] Seabios object which fail to link + linker script Minimal set of files from seabios to get link error reproduced. Sep 22, 2011 Posts: 81 View posts #5 Posted by dfansler: Sun. If I were to move the tables to Flash, would that take a seperate program just to place them in Flash, or can that be done using the JATAEICE mkII as Aug 25, 2011 Posts: 475 View posts Location: Europe #8 Posted by catweax: Mon. Check This Out

You signed in with another tab or window. MiBit? That delayed setting expld.phase = lang_final_phase_enum until just before the final lang_do_assignments, breaking the assignments done in lang_relax_sections. the flash sector containing the environment variables is surrounded by code. http://www.avrfreaks.net/forum/cannot-move-location-counter-backwards-00007008

Return NULL section for logical ops. (fold_binary ): Use new_rel_from_abs to set value to a consistent result. (fold_name ): Return new_number, not new_abs. (fold_name ): Likewise. (fold_name Current (2.20.51.20100925-1) version in Debian/experimental had same problem as Ubuntu one (2.20.51.20100908-0ubuntu2). all unanswered unresolved Ask a question 0 Linker 'cannot move counter backwards' on mbed.

Is it integrated into the payload? First create a group for your serial device (e.g. But as I have started to add more code, the error has returned. Add Answer.

Declaring the tables as CONST reduced the data down to 4104 - seems to have solved the problem. Patches: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.2324&r2=1.2325 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/ldexp.c.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.93&r2=1.94 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/ldexp.h.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.28&r2=1.29 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/ldlang.c.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.366&r2=1.367 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/ldlang.h.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.96&r2=1.97 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/pe-dll.c.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.136&r2=1.137 Comment 5 cvs-commit@gcc.gnu.org 2011-05-03 15:16:51 UTC CVSROOT: /cvs/src Module name: src Branch: binutils-2_21-branch Changes by: amodra@sourceware.org 2011-05-03 15:16:40 Modified files: ld : ChangeLog ldexp.c Marcin Juszkiewicz (hrw) wrote on 2010-11-03: #6 fix from upstream binutils Edit (2.4 KiB, text/plain) This patch from upstream solved problem. Not the answer you're looking for?

Try commenting out one (or more) line(s) before the line containing the "common/environment.o" statement. [ "lib_generic/zlib.o" is usually a good candidate for testing as it's big ]. The compiler will place the tables next to the code and the JTAGICE will just write them to the Flash memory, from where they can be read just like a (slightly Comment 5 Marcin Juszkiewicz 2010-10-15 15:51:51 UTC 17:49 hrw@home:coreboot-trunk$ ld --version GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.20.51-system.20101014 This snapshot version allows me to link both coreboot and seabios. My build succeeded following these instructions.

Apr 30, 2012 - 11:22 AM 12345Total votes: 0 I fear I am not versed enough with the AT32UC to exactly which memory. Thanks for you help, David Log in or register to post comments Top catweax Level: Hangaround Joined: Thu. So I fetched few versions from snapshot.debian.org and started testing. Multiboot Information structure has been written. 0.

Check out the Tour! http://scriptkeeper.net/cannot-move/cannot-move-location-counter-backwards-avr32.html I > updated the Makefile to use gcc 4.5 instead of the 4.4 that ships with > my distribution (Ubuntu 10.10): […] > src/arch/x86/coreboot_ram.ld:129 cannot move location counter backwards > (from I am running AVRStudio 5.1.208 on Win7 32 bit. This information was last pulled 3 hours ago.

Abstract 14.2.10. Hot Network Questions What crime would be illegal to uncover in medieval Europe? I followed the instructions here: http://www.coreboot.org/Build_HOWTO to configure for qemux86 with a 256K ROM. this contact form Description Marcin Juszkiewicz 2010-09-27 13:55:15 UTC Today I tried to compile coreboot and seabios for one of my boards.

Developer does not see priority in git Development Workflow being followed What was Stan Lee's character reading on the bus in Doctor Strange My cat sat down on my laptop, now You probably have plenty of that left, but it’ll be complicated if the tables have to be modified. Draw a hollow square of # with given width Best way to remove old paint from door hinges Adverb for "syntax" Are “Referendum” and “Plebiscite” the same in the meaning, or

I > updated the Makefile to use gcc 4.5 instead of the 4.4 that ships with > my distribution (Ubuntu 10.10): > Index: Makefile > =================================================================== > --- Makefile (revision 6637)

I'm getting an error with the current Debian testing binutils, and it looks very similar. Seems to work. Answer: You need to edit your udev rules. All Rights Reserved.

It failed under Ubuntu so I tried Debian chroot. ATTR{idVendor}=="", ATTR{idProduct}=="", GROUP="plugdev", MODE="0664" Reload udev rules: udevadm control --reload-rules Question: Flashing of a device somehow does not work although it should / did before. Apr 30, 2012 - 01:31 PM 12345Total votes: 0 opps - I meant 256k not 256M. navigate here Edit bug mail Other bug subscribers Subscribe someone else Patches fix from upstream binutils (edit) Add patch Remote bug watches sourceware-bugs #12066 [RESOLVED FIXED] Edit Bug watches keep track of this

The u-boot.lds tries to collect as many as possible code in the first part, making the gap between this first part and the environment sector as small as possible. more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed coreboot (svn://coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@5858) failure: gcc -m32 -Wa,--divide -fno-stack-protector -Wl,--build-id=none -nostdlib -nostartfiles -static -o build/coreboot_ram -Lbuild -T src/arch/i386/coreboot_ram.ld build/coreboot_ram.o src/arch/i386/coreboot_ram.ld:143 cannot move location counter backwards (from 0000000000118000 to 0000000000004000) collect2: ld returned 1 Posted 2016-10-25 18:57:11 by Jay Recent questions nrf52832 SPI to builtin LIS2DH accelerometer Posted 2016-11-07 22:59:22 by Balco wrong pstorage data read when data flashed manually with nrfjprog --memwr Posted 2016-11-07

When assigning a plain number to dot, assume the value is relative to expld.section. In Sourceware.org Bugzilla #12066, Marcin Juszkiewicz (hrw) wrote on 2010-09-29: #9 How to reproduce: $ git clone git://git.linuxtogo.org/home/kevin/seabios.git $ git checkout 94dc9c49c283cd576c25692d17567035557a2505 $ cd seabios $ make V=1 In Sourceware.org Bugzilla Comment 2 Richard Guenther 2011-05-03 11:23:27 UTC Confirmed also with the current 2.21 branch head and also with 2010-12-04 Alan Modra * ldlang.c (lang_size_sections_1): Align lma using same alignment as Am i really running out of memory, or is there a way to allocate more memory to kill this error/problem?

Apr 27, 2012 - 08:59 AM 12345Total votes: 0 Actually, if those huge tables are immutable, just place them in Flash.